Doctor-patient relationship: from medical paternalism to enhanced autonomy.

نویسنده

  • J J Chin
چکیده

For centuries, physicians have been allowed to interfere and overrule patient's preferences with the aim of securing patient benefit or preventing harm. With the radical rise in emphasis on individual control and freedom, medical paternalism no longer receives unquestioned acceptance by society as the dominant mode for decision-making in health care. But neither is a decision-making approach based on absolute patient autonomy a satisfactory one. A more ethical and effective approach is to enhance a patient's autonomy by advocating a medical beneficence that incorporates patients' values and perspectives. This can be achieved through a model for shared decision making, acknowledging that though the final choices reside ultimately in patients, only through physician beneficence can the patient be empowered to make meaningful decisions that serve them best. For such a model to function effectively, the restoration of trust in doctor-patient relationship and the adoption of patient-centred communication are both crucial.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A defence of medical paternalism : A defence of inedical paternalismn : maximising patients ' autonomy

All illness represents a state ofdiminished autonomy and therefore the doctor-patient relationship necessarily and justifiably involves a degree ofmedical paternalism argues the author, an American medical student. In a broadranging paper he discusses the concepts ofautonomy and paternalism in the context of the doctor-patient relationship. Given the necessary diminution ofautonomy which illnes...

متن کامل

I-22: A Critique on "Consent to Medical Interventions"In Penal Code of Iran

s:1462:"Informed consent is central to the doctor-patient relationship and especially to respect the autonomy of the patient that is one of the four principles of biomedical ethics. According to article 190 of Civil Code "consent of both parties is an essential provision for a contract to be made" and according to the definition of contract under Article 183 of the same code, it seems that the ...

متن کامل

Autonomy in medical ethics after O'Neill.

Following the influential Gifford and Reith lectures by Onora O'Neill, this paper explores further the paradigm of individual autonomy which has been so dominant in bioethics until recently and concurs that it is an aberrant application and that conceptions of individual autonomy cannot provide a sufficient and convincing starting point for ethics within medical practice. We suggest that revisi...

متن کامل

Paternalism and the doctor-patient relationship in general practice.

This paper is a brief introduction to the subject of paternalism as it occurs in general practice. A definition of paternalism is provided and the four main types of doctor-patient relationship within the paternalistic spectrum are described. These relationships are illustrated with examples from general practice. Some of the extensive literature on paternalism is reviewed. It is concluded that...

متن کامل

Existential autonomy: why patients should make their own choices.

Savulescu has recently introduced the "rational non-interventional paternalist" model of the patient-doctor relationship. This paper addresses objections to such a model from the perspective of an anaesthetist. Patients need to make their own decisions if they are to be fully autonomous. Rational non-interventional paternalism undermines the importance of patient choice and so threatens autonom...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Singapore medical journal

دوره 43 3  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2002